I read print in hardbound and trade paperback books, rarely in newspapers and magazines, cd liner notes (almost impossible even with magnifiers), ingredients on food packaging, wine bottle labels and mostly nowadays on a computer monitor. I do most of my reading now online. I do not see myself ever buying a Kindle. When I read a novel, short stories or a book about mythology or whatever, I prefer a hardbound copy or a trade paperback. Quality trade paperbacks are my choice since they are more easily held, lighter, cheaper and more flexible. I love the smell of a new book. I usually open a new book or like new book and smell the spine. Is this a fetish? I would miss that quirk. Mass market paperbacks are flimsy and usually the print is miniscule, so I avoid them. I have read about the pros and cons of Kindle, but remain unconvinced. If I was a commuter or stuck in a God-forsaken cubicle, I might reconsider. They are light, portable, the contrast seems to be good and they are easily hidden. I don't travel for extended periods of time so I need only one book, if that. If and when I go to Sicily or Calabria again, the book is written on every stone I would fortunately step on.
Maud Newton has written a timely freely-associated (the entry is really for her upcoming moderation of a panel on Literature and The Digital Age) post on the various forms of books in the digital age:
"As Toni Morrison observed in her endorsement for the Kindle, reading novels means entering another world. When I’m fully immersed, I don’t focus on the pages, or how I move between them, but on the story itself."
As usual, Maud gets to the heart of the matter in her own succinct way.
Here's the rub for me. I know that my fictional novel reading has suffered due to my online reading. By online reading, I mean reading articles, or blogposts of fairly limited length. Oh, yes and YouTube. ADS and eyestrain, I know, but when I see an online article that is, say, 10-15 LONG pages, I balk. I do read them, but rarely and only when I get swept into the narrative of another world. Lately, I find myself unable to read a sustained print novel of say 400-600 pages. Under 400 or so, I'm still good if the narrative flow or author's style grabs my attention somehow and the story's rhythm(s) begins to resonate, transporting me to landscapes, villages, cities, other worlds, mindscapes, emotionally treacherous terrain and times out of time. Yes, also to short stories and essays. Thank you, Eudora Welty. "Love Is A Four Letter Word" took a few days, but that's only because I didn't want to finish it too quickly.
But my attention span is variable and seasonal, and yes, I know ADS again. Is this something that is digitally induced or is it just old age? Or a combination of the two? I have unread books on my shelf that have been there for 20+ years. They keep me company. They tell me that I have much more to discover. Maybe I should wait until I open that one book and it will look like the ones on my shelf and "will be whatever book I desire when I open it".