The 2008 American Wine Blog Awards have been announced. However, there has been a call for a recount. There seems to be have been some irregularities in the voting. The voting of the judges appears to be on the up and up, but it is the voting of the public, 70% of the vote, that has been called into question. It seems that people voted more than once using spurious names while casting multiple votes. Are those ground ballot stubs mixed in with that 20 year old Sarmassa Barolo? Some bloggers who were not nominated for any categories were not only disappointed, but somewhat mortified. The wine blogosphere is a very unique one in this vast web of internets. There are endless discussions of points vs non-points. What's the point? There is one site that has a photograph to convey their impressions of a wine. Instead of endless adjectives like pencil lead, asphalt, chicken poop, crushed stone, squirrel fur, clinker, old Life Magazines, these ingenious folks short circuit that baffling lexicon with a visual image. They won best graphics and deserve it. The awards singled out some excellent wine blogs, like Vinography for Best Blog Writing and Good Wine Under $20 for Best Single Subject Blog. As a neophyte, I have come to learn that people can get quite testy over their view of mother nature's product of the vine. The heated arguments often get in the way of, uh, enjoying the wine and food. Another topic that is endlessly dissected is natural versus humanly manipulated wines. Yes, there is a human factor and that should be minimal. Sometimes the wine makes itself, but by and large human beings tweak wines. Believe it or not, most human beings are part of nature, estranged though they may be from the Great Mother's source. Get over it. Some people are named Pope and are therefore 96-points-infallible. Others are called Czarinas, much to the chagrin of certain well intentioned people. The road to Dante's Pizzeria is not paved with a sea of Brunello.
So, the recount is on. What with the looming Italian wine industry miasma and the questionable voting in the Wine Blog Awards, all bets are off. Who can one trust anymore? Those selling the wine, those writing about selling the wine, those writing about those writing about wine, those writing about subjectivity and/or objectivity in tasting wine, those writing about the wine as it comes from the earth gently coaxed by the artist's hands or, just maybe, trust the wine itself. Eco would have much fun in this arena.
Tom Wark of Fermentation is a honest poker player. He will sort all this out, that is, if there was any funny bizness to begin with. 'A basta.
The 1st of the cruellest month!